Papers

__**In Preparation.**__
 * Sprenger, A. //Sequential Hypothesis Generation//
 * Teubner-Rhodes, S.E. //The emotional Stroop effect: Time-course and mechanisms for interference//

__**Submitted.**__
 * Hussey, E.K. & Novick, J.M. //The benefits of executive control training: A perspective on the////implications for language processing.//
 * Novick, J.M., Hussey, E.K., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Dougherty, M.R., Harbison, J.I., Bunting, M. //Clearing the garden-path: Improving sentence processing through executive control training.//
 * Hussey, E.K., Dougherty, M.R., Harbison, J.I., Davelaar, E. //Retrieval Dynamics in Self-terminated Memory Search//
 * Siegel, E., Dougherty, M. R., Huber, D. E. //Manipulating the need for cognitive control while taking the implicit association test.//
 * Sprenger, A.M., Dougherty, M.R., Atkins, S.A., Franco-Watkins, A.M., Thomas, R.P., Lange, N., Abbs, B. //Implications of Cognitive Load for Hypothesis Generation and Probability Judgment.//

__**Published.**__
 * Harbison, J.I., Atkins, S., Dougherty, M.R. (2011). N-back training task performance: Analysis and model. // Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting. //
 * Tomlinson, T.D., Marewski, J.N., Dougherty, M.R. (2011). Four challenges for cognitive research on the recognition heuristic and a call for a research strategy shift. //Judgment and Decision Making//, //6(1),// 89-99.
 * Huber, D.E., Tomlinson, T.D., Rieth, C. R. and Davelaar, E.J. (2010) Reply to Bäuml and Hanslmayr: Adding or subtracting memories? The neural correlates of learned interference vs. memory inhibition . //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107//, E4.
 * Tomlinson, T.D., Huber, D.E., Rieth, C. A. and Davelaar, E.J. (2009) An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm . //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106//, 15588-15593.
 * Pleskac, T.J., Dougherty, M.R.P., Rivadeneira, A.W., & Wallsten, T.S. (2009). Random error in judgment: The contribution of encoding and retrieval processes. //Journal of Memory and Language//, //60//, 165-179.
 * Harbison, J.I., Dougherty, M.R., Davelaar, E.J. and Fayyad, B. (2009) On the lawfulness of the decision to terminate memory search . //Cognition, 111//, 397-402.
 * Cox, G.E., Harbison, J.I., & Davelaar, E. (2008) From list learning to semantic knowledge: Search and learning of associative memory. // Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting. //
 * Harbison, I.J., Davelaar, E., & Dougherty, M.R. (2008). Stopping rules and memory search termination decisions. //Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meeting.//
 * Thomas, R.P., Dougherty, M.R., Sprenger, A., & Harbison, J.I. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment. //Psychological Review, 115,// 155-185//.//
 * Dougherty, M.R., Thomas, R. & Franco-Watkins, A.M. (2008). PostScript: Vague heuristics revisited. //Psychological Review, 115,// 211-213//.//
 * Dougherty, M.R., Franco-Watkins, A., & Thomas, R.P. (2008). The psychological plausibility of fast and frugal heuristics. //Psychological Review, 115,// 199-211//.//
 * Dougherty, M.R. & Harbinson, J.I. (2007). Retrieval failure in memory: How long does one keep going back to the well when the well is dry? //Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33,// 1108-1117.
 * Barnes, K.A. & Dougherty, M.R. (2007). The effect of divided attention on the accuracy of global JOLs. //American Journal of Psychology, 120, 347-359.//
 * Franco-Watkins, A. & Dougherty, M.R. (2006). Does context discrimination in recognition memory depend on the concreteness of the to-be-remembered items? Memory and Cognition,34 973-985.
 * Dougherty, M.R. & Sprenger, A. (2006). The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: How irrelevant information can bias judged probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 262-281.
 * Sprenger, A. & Dougherty, M.R. (2006). Differences Between Probability and Frequency Judgments: The Role of Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 202-211.
 * Dougherty, M.R.P. & Hunter, J.E. (2003). Probability judgment and subadditivity: The role of working memory capacity and constrained retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 31, 968-982.
 * Dougherty, M.R.P. & Hunter, J.E. (2003). Hypothesis generation, probability judgment and individual differences in working memory capacity. Acta Psychologica, 113, 263-282.
 * Dougherty, M.R.P. & Franco-Watkins, A.M. (2003). Reducing bias in frequency judgment by improving source monitoring. Acta Psychologica, 113, 23-44.
 * Franco-Watkins, A., Derks, P., & Dougherty, M.R.P. (2003). Choice behaviour and probability judgements in the Monty Hall problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 9, 67-90.
 * Dougherty, M.R.P. (2001). Integration of the ecological and error models of overconfidence using a multiple-trace memory model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 579-599.
 * Dougherty, M.R.P., & Franco-Watkins, A.M. (2000). A rational analysis of rationality? Review of K. Stanovich’s “Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning.” Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 593-597.
 * Dougherty, M.R.P., Gettys, C.F., & Ogden, E.E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.